Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Aug 2017 18:03:01 +0100
From:      David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
Cc:        tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: swapfile query
Message-ID:  <BAD32602-C6A9-4A82-B0CB-148D313B90D6@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201708191654.v7JGs8sM063853@slippy.cwsent.com>
References:  <201708191654.v7JGs8sM063853@slippy.cwsent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 Aug 2017, at 17:54, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> wrote:
>=20
>> 3. should total swap be 1x 2x or some other multiple of RAM these =
days?
>=20
> Depends. If you're running some kind of database server or OLTP=20
> application. Some vendors recommend no swap whatsoever while others=20
> recommend some. What does your application vendor recommend?

The main advantage of swap these days (on machines with that sort of =
amount of RAM) is to allow you to keep some file-backed memory objects =
in memory in preference to leaked (or very cold) heap memory. =20

David




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAD32602-C6A9-4A82-B0CB-148D313B90D6>