Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:03 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: martinko <martinkov@pobox.sk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upcoming release 6.1: old version of some core components Message-ID: <20060412191003.GA25961@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <e1jj4v$64i$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <443BAE40.9050704@dial.pipex.com> <001301c65d7f$0b9dab70$dededede@avalon.lan> <20060411203727.GA90177@xor.obsecurity.org> <e1jhn4$vhe$1@sea.gmane.org> <20060412184851.GA25677@xor.obsecurity.org> <e1jj4v$64i$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:07:11PM +0200, martinko wrote: > and it feels they're not going to release 1.0 any time soon.. i've been > seeing 0.9.something for longer than i can remember. >=20 > and btw i've always thought of openssl and openssh as somehow > coupled/interconnected. but openssl hasn't reached 1.0 while openssh is > already past 4. (and again it seems to me openssh changes major numbers > not according to major changes but whenever its version reaches x.9.) openssh uses openssl but they're not tightly coupled. Kris --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEPVCKWry0BWjoQKURAtF1AJ9qrlRX1uqYdNIFepikn5rFcBGZ4gCeM17j mgzZ+pj+ksh9gQrVzVzwsAY= =Me50 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060412191003.GA25961>