Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:37:11 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>, src-committers@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187132 - head/usr.bin/make Message-ID: <20090130123711.GA89940@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730901300402q61273d58q76472e585985fc3c@mail.gmail.com> References: <200901130653.n0D6rrNX092719@svn.freebsd.org> <20090130015518.GA20404@hades.panopticon> <20090130113402.GB92386@dragon.NUXI.org> <9bbcef730901300402q61273d58q76472e585985fc3c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:02:15PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > 2009/1/30 David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org>: > > > compiler invocation must really bug you. Perhaps we should have the > > quiet out put of the ncftp3 build where every complication takes only > > 1 line: > > > > Compiling DStrCat.so: [OK] > > Compiling DStrFree.so: [OK] > > Compiling Dynscpy.so: [OK] > > Compiling Strncpy.so: [OK] > > Compiling strtokc.so: [OK] > > ..snip.. > > I'd vote for that being the default :) I would not. In fact I am quite happy that is not the default. > > It's also the mode used by Linux kernel (note that it's not a pro or a > contra argument in itself), e.g. True, and it is a PITA when there is a problem with the compilation, since you need to add extra flags to the verbose output so you can find out what flags the compiler actually was invoked with. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090130123711.GA89940>