Date: Mon, 07 Oct 1996 18:21:12 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: "Brian N. Handy" <handy@sag.space.lockheed.com> Cc: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= <ache@nagual.ru>, Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Subject: Re: I plan to change random() for -current (was Re: rand() and random()) Message-ID: <3259AC88.2781E494@whistle.com> References: <Pine.OSF.3.94.961007111439.817I-100000@sag.space.lockheed.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian N. Handy wrote: > > Hey all, > > I'm trying to stay on top of this thread and follow all the theories, and > So, following in this line of reasoning, I support fixing random(). > Brian me too. I'd like to see an option to use /dev/random too (link with -lreallyrandom)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3259AC88.2781E494>