Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:58:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233283] IPv6 routing problem when using FreeBSD as a VPS at a cloud provider Message-ID: <bug-233283-7501-7mq1nXVuGr@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-233283-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-233283-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233283 --- Comment #11 from peos42 <peo_s@incedo.org> --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #8) RFC 4861 say:=20 --snip-- If the source address of the packet prompting the solicitation is the=20 same as one of the addresses assigned to the outgoing interface, that=20 address SHOULD be placed in the IP Source Address of the outgoing=20 solicitation. Otherwise, any one of the addresses assigned to the=20 interface should be used.=20=20=20 --snip-- So it IS permissible for another address to appear here. RFC 5942 that upda= tes RFC 4861 seems to not change this. This is probably why it works on Linux, windows, DragonflyBSD etc. I guess = they have seen this as the statement is quite clear.=20 /Peo --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233283-7501-7mq1nXVuGr>