Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:33:50 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: lang/gcc on freebsd 10 Message-ID: <4EEF130E.6080500@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112191504200.2707@zbenl.fvgr> References: <4EE9D2F6.2090906@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112152338530.11601@zbenl.fvgr> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112191504200.2707@zbenl.fvgr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 19/12/2011 08:06 Gerald Pfeifer said the following: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>> lang/gcc build would fail for me on FreeBSD 10 (head) with binutils-2.22 >>> installed during its configure step with the errors like the following in >>> config.log: >> >> Yes, I am aware of it. lang/gcc is the slowly moving, conservative >> option, lang/gcc46 being the fast, aggressive one. In consequence, >> lang/gcc46 has already been fixed with regard to FreeBSD 10, whereas >> this likely will take another month or so for lang/gcc when the next >> upstream release hapens. >> >> (Had I better network connectivity right now, I might try the backport, > > I managed to get a somewhat decent connection now (and until Thursday). > > Want to give the attached patch against lang/gcc a try? It passes my > tests, but I'd prefer to get confirmation from someone directly affected > before committing it. The patch worked for me too, thank you. The only small trouble with it was that the resulting files/patch-freebsd10 had the dos line endings. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EEF130E.6080500>