Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:49:02 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interactive ports - the plague Message-ID: <47CC643E.3050406@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <924DE1DC-B8AD-4557-AAD2-E5C31F77E09A@khera.org> References: <47CBC3C5.9050007@bsdforen.de> <20080303155354.2043d131@gumby.homeunix.com.> <47CC26F3.7020709@cyberbotx.com> <20080303170457.02959c09@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20080303172750.GB65151@atarininja.org> <924DE1DC-B8AD-4557-AAD2-E5C31F77E09A@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vivek Khera wrote: > On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: > >> I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in >> /etc/mail/mailer.conf. > > I'll take that as a bug report :-) > > Though I'm not sure which way it should default, on BATCH. And does > BATCH apply to package install as well? I think the usual way is to mention in pkg-message what aught to be done instead of offering to do it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47CC643E.3050406>