Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:21:53 +0100 From: Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> To: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187132 - head/usr.bin/make Message-ID: <4982FEF1.2000309@dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <20090130123711.GA89940@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <200901130653.n0D6rrNX092719@svn.freebsd.org> <20090130015518.GA20404@hades.panopticon> <20090130113402.GB92386@dragon.NUXI.org> <9bbcef730901300402q61273d58q76472e585985fc3c@mail.gmail.com> <20090130123711.GA89940@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:02:15PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >> 2009/1/30 David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org>: >> >>> compiler invocation must really bug you. Perhaps we should have the >>> quiet out put of the ncftp3 build where every complication takes only >>> 1 line: >>> >>> Compiling DStrCat.so: [OK] >>> Compiling DStrFree.so: [OK] >>> Compiling Dynscpy.so: [OK] >>> Compiling Strncpy.so: [OK] >>> Compiling strtokc.so: [OK] >>> ..snip.. >> I'd vote for that being the default :) > > I would not. In fact I am quite happy that is not the default. > >> It's also the mode used by Linux kernel (note that it's not a pro or a >> contra argument in itself), e.g. > > True, and it is a PITA when there is a problem with the compilation, since > you need to add extra flags to the verbose output so you can find out what > flags the compiler actually was invoked with. I took that vote as a joke. It may only be a joke, right? harti
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4982FEF1.2000309>