Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 18:10:00 -0800 From: Chris Piazza <cpiazza@jaxon.net> To: "Chris D. Faulhaber" <jedgar@fxp.org> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/15135: new port: devel/cervisia Message-ID: <19991128181000.A16943@norn.ca.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911282101360.44081-100000@pawn.primelocation.net>; from jedgar@fxp.org on Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 09:06:19PM -0500 References: <199911290200.SAA82918@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911282101360.44081-100000@pawn.primelocation.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 09:06:19PM -0500, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Will Andrews wrote:
>
> I considered porting it a while ago but hesitated due to the
> aforementioned problems. I agree that kde should be using 2.95.2
> throughout; however, as I stated a while back, a lot of people are not
> gonna be happy with recompiling their libs to use use new applications.
>
> And I still pose the question, is it okay to port an application
> requiring the new gcc and marking as broken for < -current until the
> qt/kde apps require the new gcc and/or mainstream release uses it.
I'd say it's fine. I did this with my port of FINE until they added support
for qt2.
-Chris
--
cpiazza@jaxon.net cpiazza@FreeBSD.org
Abbotsford, BC, Canada
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991128181000.A16943>