Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:00:10 +0900
From:      Byung-Hee HWANG <bh@izb.knu.ac.kr>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is your Thunderbird OK?
Message-ID:  <1190793610.2197.3.camel@viola.izb.knu.ac.kr>
In-Reply-To: <fdbajf$2u58$1@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net>
References:  <1190618389.1658.7.camel@viola.izb.knu.ac.kr> <20070924143326.G28769@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1190734913.1978.17.camel@viola.izb.knu.ac.kr> <fdbajf$2u58$1@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 17:47 +0200, Christian Baer wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:41:53 +0900 Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> 
> > Yeah I also like text based MUAs such as mutt or pine. Sometimes I get
> > HTML messages from my co-workers who use webmail. I must read those HTML
> > messages for my work, study. That's why I need windows-like MUAs, not
> > text based MUAs. Is there any other best MUA? I _really_ feel thirsty
> > for best MUA.. anytime..
> 
> If you can live without the pretty pictures, you can configure Mutt to use
> an external browser like lynx or links to display HTML.
> 
> Otherwise, you could give Claws a closer look.
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
After I read your replying mail, I investigated the Claws. I am
considering for moving from this Evolution to the Claws.

But still Thunderbird will remain as the best MUA to me.

Thank you so much!

Byung-Hee




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1190793610.2197.3.camel>