Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 May 2007 12:38:14 -0500
From:      "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com>
To:        "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Is em endian-clean?
Message-ID:  <b1fa29170705221038m7dc42f60ma4cca8328462ad77@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0705221017s77167f1bu8d6e5d8f7bcbc4cd@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <b1fa29170705212059q5895428dk6c4946d4bf47192d@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0705220045p68b59df7iff7689ec2f7e19f4@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0705221017s77167f1bu8d6e5d8f7bcbc4cd@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/22/07, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, Linux is tested on big endian, however FreeBSD testing
> > is limited. I would expect the shared code to be ok but the
> > core code is tested on little endian only. Do you have some
> > notion of where the problem is? I'm pretty busy with another
> > issue right at the moment.
> >
> > Jack
>
> I am setting up an older MAC our test group had, adding at least
> basic traffic passing test to our test cycle.
>

Thank you. I appreciate this.

              -Kip



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170705221038m7dc42f60ma4cca8328462ad77>