Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 14:20:21 -0400 From: Parv <parv@pair.com> To: "Gary W. Swearingen" <garys@opusnet.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tarring a dump. Problems with a pipe Message-ID: <20050908182021.GA15829@holestein.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <y78xy78mkq.xy7@mail.opusnet.com> References: <200509081521.j88FL8N3085702@aristotle.tamu.edu> <njd5nj8rky.5nj@mail.opusnet.com> <20050908171835.GC14196@holestein.holy.cow> <y78xy78mkq.xy7@mail.opusnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <y78xy78mkq.xy7@mail.opusnet.com>, wrote Gary W. Swearingen thusly... > > Parv <parv@pair.com> writes: > > > In this context, by "bzip" did you actually meant "bzip2"? > > (There is a archivers/bzip port.) > > No, I presented bzip2-labeled test results and then made > statements about archivers/bzip. Thanks much for clarifying. > But I suppose they're true about "bzip2" too. Can't comment (as i have not done any tests comparing bzip to bzip2). - Parv --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050908182021.GA15829>