Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 01:22:33 -0700 From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <chad@shire.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <69120B54-7D98-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <1095160797.20050213085726@wanadoo.fr> References: <20050212203851.D694116A4D3@hub.freebsd.org> <1108249638.32574.49.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <863830644.20050213025358@wanadoo.fr> <BE475D84-7D76-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net> <1095160797.20050213085726@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 13, 2005, at 12:57 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: > >> Maybe companies who support MS or other proprietary software >> can't as they don't have the source. But support companies that >> support open source can very easily fix problems -- they have the >> source and the license to use it > > Unfortunately, their fix makes the software non-standard. You need to > be able to roll fixes into the official release. ????? What the heck does this mean? I would bet that most larger installations of Linux or FreeBSD or any other open source OS would be considered non-standard. Heck, I bet YOUR installation of FreeBSD could be considered non-standard. Your statement make absolutely no sense. If the fix that you decry is a reasonable fix, who says it can't be rolled back into an "official" release. This is open source after all. Chad > > -- > Anthony > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?69120B54-7D98-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC>