Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 22:03:58 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: utisoft@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to move vi to /bin Message-ID: <4a0cf7be.JDsmRk7tps2dbK1B%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <b79ecaef0905140953r1488316tffc33ed0d3a3b387@mail.gmail.com> References: <cb0fa7b70905130021t390bb560r4a1dd64ab3b2e79@mail.gmail.com> <b79ecaef0905130130o10d593cdm3fb60b6175112d67@mail.gmail.com> <gue44o$pqu$1@ger.gmane.org> <200905132211.53066.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <b79ecaef0905140338lf7b6968k8e8844550c9268b9@mail.gmail.com> <20090514160325.GA26585@kokopelli.hydra> <b79ecaef0905140953r1488316tffc33ed0d3a3b387@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Rees <googlemail.com!utisoft@agora.rdrop.com> wrote: > 2009/5/14 Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>: > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:38:30AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > >> I think the problem with that is he meant changing the root > >> shell to /usr/local/bin/bash. You're better off using /bin/sh > >> if you want a Bourne-type shell, or using toor with > >> /usr/local/bin/bash. > > > > I've never understood the resistance to just use toor instead > > of root if one wants a nonstandard administrative shell. > > People don't seem to understand that toor and root are equivalent. Well, not entirely. "su" uses root's shell, not toor's, AFAIK.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4a0cf7be.JDsmRk7tps2dbK1B%perryh>