Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:49:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> Subject: ports/104683: Repocopy lang/gcc42 to lang/gcc43. Message-ID: <200610221949.k9MJn0s4001876@nibal.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> Resent-Message-ID: <200610221950.k9MJoJVI041107@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 104683 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Repocopy lang/gcc42 to lang/gcc43. >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: maintainer-update >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Oct 22 19:50:19 GMT 2006 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Gerald Pfeifer >Release: >Organization: >Environment: >Description: Please repocopy lang/gcc42 to lang/gcc43. GCC 4.2 has branched, so we now got two codestreams upstream: lang/gcc42 will track the GCC 4.2 release branch; the new lang/gcc43 will continue to track active GCC development. ALTERNATIVELY, please tell me it's okay to just commit this as a new port. Avoiding the repocopy actually may make sense: the gcc42 port doesn't have too much in common with the original egcs port, and too tags already read old_old_..._old_old. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610221949.k9MJn0s4001876>