Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:57:26 -0600 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= <ltning@anduin.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Upgrade feasibility, to AMD64/5.x.x or to stay i386/4.9 on AMD64 hardware? Message-ID: <22C2CD15-219C-11D9-AA05-003065A70D30@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <5F8020A8-2141-11D9-A8A9-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net> References: <000501c4b547$6a577b00$0300000a@transcon> <5F8020A8-2141-11D9-A8A9-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 18, 2004, at 2:07 PM, Eirik =D8verby wrote: >> Adaptec AAC-2410SA 4-Port S-ATA RAID Controller > > This one is gonna be tricky on you, I think. Should work fine. I was using a 2200S, which uses the same aac driver=20= under 5-CURRENT on amd64 a while back before I downgraded to i386=20 version. And I have a 2410SA (same aac driver) working on an i386 machine with=20= 5.2.1 or something like that :-) now. I know that that is not a 64bit=20= machine but according to Scott Long sometime back, the aac driver is 64=20= bit clean. Maybe the asr driver is not 64bit ok but the aac one seems to be fine Chad
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22C2CD15-219C-11D9-AA05-003065A70D30>