Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 12:41:48 +0100 (MET) From: Søren Schmidt <sos@FreeBSD.ORG> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@cimlogic.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: binutils bloat Message-ID: <199803141141.MAA16622@sos.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <8250.889875438@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Mar 14, 98 03:37:18 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who wrote:
> > If we are going to have crosstarget development tools, it should be
> > completely optional, preferably a port.
>
> Ports are actually a really nasty solution for anything that might
> involve building an eventual release, trust me! Just breaking out the
> SGML stuff for docs was painful enough, and that was exceedingly
> peripheral.
You mean you would build all the different machine releases on ONE
platform ??? That will be quite a task :)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team
Even more code to hack -- will it ever end
..
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803141141.MAA16622>