Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:13:37 -0500
From:      Alan Cox <alan.l.cox@gmail.com>
To:        "Polyack, Steve" <Steve.Polyack@intermedix.com>
Cc:        Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: vmdaemon CPU usage and poor performance in 10.0-RELEASE
Message-ID:  <CAJUyCcNoTJ3xqkC_Prz3N%2BApEqYy3Mi2gA%2BuDo33dczaTMONrA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D557EC7CC2A544AA7C1A3B9CBA2B36726098847AF@exchange03.epbs.com>
References:  <4D557EC7CC2A544AA7C1A3B9CBA2B36726098846B4@exchange03.epbs.com> <20140813152522.GI9400@home.opsec.eu> <4D557EC7CC2A544AA7C1A3B9CBA2B36726098847AF@exchange03.epbs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Polyack, Steve <
Steve.Polyack@intermedix.com> wrote:

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kurt Jaeger [mailto:lists@opsec.eu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:25 AM
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > > We have a handful of database servers running FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE
> > > and PostgreSQL 9.3.4.  The servers have 128GB or 256GB of RAM.
> >
> > Are you aware of the recent work on that topic ?
> >
> > https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-04-2014-
> > 06.html#PostgreSQL-Performance-Improvements
> >
> > Maybe kib@ knows more about this ?
> >
>
> I've recently read over this and some other posts, but they all seem to
> center around poor postgres performance.  In our case at least, some light
> to medium usage of postgres generally makes the entire system unusable.
>
> The patches & documents linked there also all seem to be for -CURRENT,
> which we aren't running.  We're not too keen on the idea of using CURRENT
> in production, either.  We're planning on testing 10-STABLE, but I was just
> hoping to gain some insight into what the problem may be and whether recent
> commits to vmdaemon code in the -STABLE tree may have a positive effect on
> what we've seen.
>
>

 There is a good chance that your problem is fixed by r265945.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJUyCcNoTJ3xqkC_Prz3N%2BApEqYy3Mi2gA%2BuDo33dczaTMONrA>