Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Dec 1997 03:00:11 -0600
From:      Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
To:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: blocksize on devfs entries (and related)
Message-ID:  <l03110700b0b94782e588@[208.2.87.4]>
In-Reply-To: <199712140222.MAA04796@word.smith.net.au>
References:  Your message of "Sat, 13 Dec 1997 20:55:27 -0000."             <199712132055.NAA29304@usr06.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 8:22 PM -0600 12/13/97, Mike Smith wrote:
>> Consider a FAT FS.  A FAT FS deals with 1K blocks.  But these 1K blocks
>> are not constrained to start at an even offset from the start of the
>> disk, only from an even cylinder boundry.
>
>In the light of the nonexistence of "cylinders" in the proposed model,
>it strikes me that this becomes an issue of synthesising a conforming
>pseudo-geometry at filesystem creation time, and little more.
>Compatability is likely an issue there.

Compatability is an issue in that the system must be able to accept and create
file systems that are acceptable to a foreign OS. Otherwise, why bother with
all these exotic file systems :-)

This is particularly important with removable media.


Richard Wackerbarth





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03110700b0b94782e588>