Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:51:43 -0500 From: Munish Chopra <chopra@soulwax.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: audio lag in 5.2-Beta (card emu10k1) Message-ID: <20031218035143.GB2107@opiate.soulwax.net> In-Reply-To: <20031218034220.GA2107@opiate.soulwax.net> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312111204530.25046-100000@shell.netikka.fi> <20031212104433.GA803@galgenberg.net> <1071237706.970.41.camel@localhost> <20031212165822.GC48271@opiate.soulwax.net> <brct7i$1b6$1@sea.gmane.org> <20031212190956.GA83087@opiate.soulwax.net> <20031217224800.GB41308@xor.obsecurity.org> <20031218031512.GA628@opiate.soulwax.net> <20031218034220.GA2107@opiate.soulwax.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[snip stuff about sound lag] On 2003-12-17 22:42 +0000, Munish Chopra wrote: > > On 2003-12-17 14:48 +0000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > Did you test the patch I posted? I have had no responses about that. > > > > > > > No, must've slipped by during finals like Mathew's patch did. I'm going > > to go hunt the archives for it, but if you could point to it instead > > that'd be great. I'll test it tonight. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Found it quicker than I thought I would. Unfortunately it doesn't change > the situation. I reverted to revision 1.89 of channel.c, 1.20 of > buffer.c, and 1.7 of buffer.h. > > I'll try going back some more if it doesn't give too much trouble and > pinpointing when things broke. I can't even remember when this first > showed up. > Embarrassingly enough another reply to myself, but I didn't think I'd find it this quickly. Reverting to revision 1.88 of channel.c fixed things right up (also 1.20 of buffer.c and 1.7 of buffer.h). No more lag. Revision 1.89 of channel.c attempted to make really short sounds actually play. Looks like buffer issues. -- Munish Chopra
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031218035143.GB2107>