Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 01:00:27 +0200 From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm@fbsd.es> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>,Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ATI radeon 3450 with new xorg Message-ID: <298d7205-8aca-4d40-b85c-b9485f46fe71@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1uSS4MUheiFJogn1EbviHGibTqV_E3M5iB3FT1VSSR0cw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20140730140133.52e2b326991439497eef6067@fbsd.es> <9FAAF553-C171-43D6-8F98-7682C524E78A@kapsi.fi> <20140730193017.351cd59d27bd010818be460c@fbsd.es> <DEAA56C6-D961-4146-BE50-0AD2944BA27C@FreeBSD.org> <CAN6yY1uSS4MUheiFJogn1EbviHGibTqV_E3M5iB3FT1VSSR0cw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for clarify it. Tomorrow I will file a bug providing more information to commit Dimitry's patch. On 31 de julio de 2014 00:31:05 CEST, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> >wrote: > >> On 30 Jul 2014, at 19:30, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm@fbsd.es> >wrote: >> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:46:36 +0300 >> > Arto Pekkanen <isoa@kapsi.fi> wrote: >> >> Is there a chance this patch would be MFC'd? >> >> I'm not sure how the branching works with ports, but this would >probably >> be a good candidate for merging to whatever the latest "stable" >branch >> is. >> >> >> > His patch fixes my problem, but I don't know if Dimitry is waiting >for >> more opinions favourable before commit it. >> >> Hi Carlos, >> >> Thanks for testing, it is good to know that it works on real >hardware! >> I have only been able to test it on a virtualized environment >myself... >> >> In any case, I am not a ports committer, so the maintainer(s) should >> commit it, or give their approval for me to do so. >> >> -Dimitry >> >> Dimitry and Carlos, > >Ports don't branch. They are only tagged at the points of FreeBSD >releases, >so all commits are to head. As a result, the term MFC is not >appropriate. >The patch simply needs to be committed to the tree. Since this port is >maintained by x11@, this is the place to talk about it. But to get the >patch committed, someone should open a bug at >http://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla. Be sure to include the patch and >report >that it has been tested and buy whom.. >-- >R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired >E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com -- Enviado desde mi teléfono con K-9 Mail. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 07:09:11 2014 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F1F182A; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from erelay3.ox.registrar-servers.com (erelay3.ox.registrar-servers.com [192.64.117.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23ED321A0; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by erelay1.ox.registrar-servers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9A12204FF7; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from erelay1.ox.registrar-servers.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (erelay.ox.registrar-servers.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1Bmof0GqQtwB; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:09:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap1.ox.privateemail.com (imap1.ox.privateemail.com [198.187.29.233]) by erelay1.ox.registrar-servers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFDD2204FF5; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:09:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA5FB00085; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:09:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap1.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap1.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id a2FJiM9NeT0Z; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:09:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (227.Red-83-33-60.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.33.60.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29695B0007B; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:09:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:08:23 +0200 From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm@fbsd.es> To: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: ATI radeon 3450 with new xorg Message-Id: <20140731090823.a295568ce982441f9be35548@fbsd.es> In-Reply-To: <298d7205-8aca-4d40-b85c-b9485f46fe71@email.android.com> References: <20140730140133.52e2b326991439497eef6067@fbsd.es> <9FAAF553-C171-43D6-8F98-7682C524E78A@kapsi.fi> <20140730193017.351cd59d27bd010818be460c@fbsd.es> <DEAA56C6-D961-4146-BE50-0AD2944BA27C@FreeBSD.org> <CAN6yY1uSS4MUheiFJogn1EbviHGibTqV_E3M5iB3FT1VSSR0cw@mail.gmail.com> <298d7205-8aca-4d40-b85c-b9485f46fe71@email.android.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i386-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-x11>, <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>, <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:09:11 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 01:00:27 +0200 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm@fbsd.es> wrote: > Thanks for clarify it. Tomorrow I will file a bug providing more informat= ion to commit Dimitry's patch. >=20 I submitted the bug 192286. Cheers, > On 31 de julio de 2014 00:31:05 CEST, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>= wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> > >wrote: > > > >> On 30 Jul 2014, at 19:30, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm@fbsd.es> > >wrote: > >> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:46:36 +0300 > >> > Arto Pekkanen <isoa@kapsi.fi> wrote: > >> >> Is there a chance this patch would be MFC'd? > >> > >> I'm not sure how the branching works with ports, but this would > >probably > >> be a good candidate for merging to whatever the latest "stable" > >branch > >> is. > >> > >> > >> > His patch fixes my problem, but I don't know if Dimitry is waiting > >for > >> more opinions favourable before commit it. > >> > >> Hi Carlos, > >> > >> Thanks for testing, it is good to know that it works on real > >hardware! > >> I have only been able to test it on a virtualized environment > >myself... > >> > >> In any case, I am not a ports committer, so the maintainer(s) should > >> commit it, or give their approval for me to do so. > >> > >> -Dimitry > >> > >> Dimitry and Carlos, > > > >Ports don't branch. They are only tagged at the points of FreeBSD > >releases, > >so all commits are to head. As a result, the term MFC is not > >appropriate. > >The patch simply needs to be committed to the tree. Since this port is > >maintained by x11@, this is the place to talk about it. But to get the > >patch committed, someone should open a bug at > >http://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla. Be sure to include the patch and > >report > >that it has been tested and buy whom.. > >-- > >R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > >E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com >=20 > --=20 > Enviado desde mi tel=E9fono con K-9 Mail. --=20 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <cpm@fbsd.es>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?298d7205-8aca-4d40-b85c-b9485f46fe71>