Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:02:34 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> Cc: Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Confirmation: ext2fs requires kernel rebuild? Message-ID: <20021121110234.GF8009@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20021121035034.GA2591@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <p05200f1ab9ff72b26ae1@[66.92.104.201]> <20021119100625.GC679@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <p05200f24ba0073e6b323@[66.92.104.201]> <20021121035034.GA2591@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-11-20 19:50, David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> wrote: > Thus spake Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com>: > > I know they're distinct, but it's silly for a discussion of Linux > > applications to ignore the possibility of those apps residing on a > > Linux filesystem. I couldn't find ext2fs documented anywhere, > > which is the first issue. The second is adding a link & comment to > > the LABI chapter. > > Hmm...I think you're right. I don't see any documentation for the > option. I would just as soon hook the module up to the default > build like all the other modules, but maybe the license is an issue. The license *is* an issue. Distributing kernels that by default include GPL'ed code can have many complications for people who make commercial applications based on FreeBSD source. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021121110234.GF8009>