Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 09:20:27 -0600 From: Erik Cameron <ecameron@bsd.uchicago.edu> To: Chuck Youse <cyouse@icon.com> Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sparc board, and clones Message-ID: <19981118092027.D6935@bsd.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <98111810273402.02475@windsock.flyboy.net>; from Chuck Youse on Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 10:26:38AM -0500 References: <19981118090757.C6935@bsd.uchicago.edu> <98111810273402.02475@windsock.flyboy.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, when you said supporting "both with one kernel" I thought the implied solution was to separate the projects entirely. It's too early... I'm gonna get a cup of coffee and see if brain likes me more after that... :| -e On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 10:26:38AM -0500, Chuck Youse wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, you wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 09:11:52AM -0500, Chuck Youse wrote: > >> While support for sun4[mcd ] is a good thing, Kapil aptly pointed out that they > >> really are a different architecture than the sun4u. To support both with one > >> kernel is possible, but cumbersome at best. Better to separate the two. > > > >One kernel is insufficient if you're not releasing source code. I mean, if > >we're talking about going through and isolating all of the (i386|alpha) code > >out of the kernel and concentrating our rewrites on that, I don't see as how > >(other than more coding) having separate sun4x and sun4u directories in the > >dist would be *that* much trouble. > >erik cameron -- bsd/is support services > >support engineer, unix frood, sysadmin, etc. > >ecameron@bsd.uchicago.edu -- pager #4167 > > Isn't that what I said? > > Chuck -- erik cameron -- bsd/is support services support engineer, unix frood, sysadmin, etc. ecameron@bsd.uchicago.edu -- pager #4167 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981118092027.D6935>