Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 03:31:56 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>, eivind@yes.no (Eivind Eklund), luigi@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.c src/sys/conf files src/sys/i386/isa if_ed.c if_ep.c if_lnc.c src/sys/net if_ethersubr.c src Message-ID: <199809191931.DAA14937@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "18 Sep 1998 20:55:05 %2B0200." <xzpiuil9rp2.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling C. =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=3DF8rgrav?=3D wrote: > Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> writes: > > About the ipfw binary compatibility my apologies because i forgot > > to mention that explicitly to the reviewers (and yes, now i remember > > you pointed that out), but the change it was absolutely necessary > > to have dummynet working. > = > You should post something on -stable warning people that they will > need to recompile ipfw the next time they recompile their kernel... If we've got to do a recompile of IPFW, then perhaps we can backport the = large [gs]etsockopt() support from -current which will remove the = contraints on the size of this structure. I backported the stuff before along with the IPFIREWALL_FORWARD support = for transparent proxy. They both work well under -stable. > DES > -- = > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no > = Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809191931.DAA14937>