Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:48:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: malloc Message-ID: <20021021174837.GA51579@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <E183Yoh-0009TR-00@cse.cs.huji.ac.il> References: <E183Yoh-0009TR-00@cse.cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > comments? That code is a REALLY inefficient use of malloc(). You can always write bizarre code that exaggerates the differences between different algorithms (e.g. Linux malloc vs FreeBSD malloc). Kris --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9tD31Wry0BWjoQKURAlO3AKCArSDTTR3BxW7KpCdKhM7gap6kQACgg7Qy BfV9uUIT3DGIct8ict1myAY= =eLOb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021021174837.GA51579>