Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:28:39 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/java/eclipseme Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <20080319132839.GC90943@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1205930539.76695.51.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <200803180100.m2I10QTD070047@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080318193855.0439b197.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20080318181546.GA10903@FreeBSD.org> <1205917353.76695.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080319091859.GA56200@FreeBSD.org> <1205921932.76695.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080319112314.GA76554@FreeBSD.org> <1205929480.76695.36.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080319153714.df825001.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1205930539.76695.51.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:42:19PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Sorry, but I don't consider the muting of mkdir commands as something > that can lead to insecure or simply broken-by-design port. Thus it's not > worth a policy. Agreed, it's not that important. When I said it should be a policy I merely thought that in this case, there'd be nothing to hesitate about. It does not make me mad when I see unmuted MKDIR, yet I'd love to see more consistency here. No more, no less. > > Or you're talking about some other common issue now? I think I managed to bring up common issue in that rather lengthy email of mine. :-) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080319132839.GC90943>