Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:22:58 -0400
From:      Nikolai Lifanov <lifanov@mail.lifanov.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r270759 - in head/sys: cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs vm
Message-ID:  <540778A2.3080809@mail.lifanov.com>
In-Reply-To: <2230377.GgKARkJyaG@ralph.baldwin.cx>
References:  <201408281950.s7SJo90I047213@svn.freebsd.org> <169C94ED141B435BACEADB04A4824717@multiplay.co.uk> <54072E20.10802@mail.lifanov.com> <2230377.GgKARkJyaG@ralph.baldwin.cx>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/03/14 15:22, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 03, 2014 11:05:04 AM Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
>> On 09/03/14 04:09, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>> I'm looking to MFC this change so wanted to check if
>>> anyone had an final feedback / objections?
>>>
>>> I know we currently have Alan's feedback on changing
>>> the #ifdef __i386__ to #ifndef UMA_MD_SMALL_ALLOC
>>> which sounds sensible but waiting Peter to comment on.
>>>
>>>    Regards
>>>    Steve
>>
>> I have no technical input, but this change improves ARC usefulness for
>> me quite a bit. I would like to see the improvement in 10-STABLE.
> 
> Can you verify that the current 10-STABLE (as of today) with all the various 
> pagedaemon fixes still has ARC issues for your workload?
> 

It doesn't have any issues, but I noticed the improvement on CURRENT. I
observed that just after this change, my package builder is much more
likely to retain MFU and not evict useful things from there (the port
tree) after large builds.
However, I run a lot more 10.0-RELEASE than CURRENT and I would like to
see this improvement release-bound.

I would be happy to test this on 10-STABLE if you think that this is
relevant.

- Nikolai Lifanov




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?540778A2.3080809>