Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 12:17:58 -0500 From: "Jacques A . Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports-maintainers? Message-ID: <20000623121758.M76049@bone.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <20000623124425.M77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM on Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 12:44:25PM -0400 References: <394CA25D.77A15740@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0006231327100.23642-100000@nunki.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20000623075752.B77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000623080331.D77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000623105332.J76049@bone.nectar.com> <20000623124425.M77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 12:44:25PM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > Repeat after me: "Procmail is good. Procmail is good. Procmail is > God." You missed the point. I don't want to RECEIVE the commit mail twice, nevermind actually SEEING it. > IMHO, we should break up the CVS commits by branch (i.e. > /home/ncvs/[doc,ports,src,www]) and have cvs-all just include all of the > cvs-$BRANCH lists. > > I could write the code to make commit_prep.pl (or whichever script it > is) to make this happen. Yeah, do that. A lotta folks (myself included) already use procmail to divide commit messages after we receive them anyway. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000623121758.M76049>