Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:36:24 +0100
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: When will ZFS become stable?
Message-ID:  <flr3iq$of7$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <47810DE3.3050106@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <fll63b$j1c$1@ger.gmane.org>	<20080106141157.I105@fledge.watson.org>	<flr0np$euj$2@ger.gmane.org> <47810DE3.3050106@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigCF28DF68F34EF7BB67EC6EA2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet in the thread, but=20
>>> another thing worth taking into account in considering the stability =

>>> of ZFS is whether or not Sun considers it a production feature in=20
>>> Solaris.  Last I heard, it was still considered an experimental=20
>>> feature there as well.
>>
>> Last I heard, rsync didn't crash Solaris on ZFS :)
>=20
> [Citation needed]

I can't provide citation about a thing that doesn't happen - you don't=20
hear things like "oh and yesterday I ran rsync on my Solaris with ZFS=20
and *it didn't crash*!" often.

But, with some grains of salt taken, consider this Google results:

* searching for "rsync crash solaris zfs": 790 results, most of them=20
obviously irrelevant
* searching for "rsync crash freebsd zfs": 10,800 results; a small=20
number of the results is from this thread, some are duplicates, but it's =

a large number in any case.

I feel that the number of Solaris+ZFS installations worldwide is larger=20
than that of FreeBSD+ZFS and they've had ZFS longer.




--------------enigCF28DF68F34EF7BB67EC6EA2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHgRGYldnAQVacBcgRAl22AKCNn8JJNdP7fYk3PNsnRhSGdwEn7gCfYUHc
clThYOP6zkJD3wFZrFqFHXc=
=Et/1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigCF28DF68F34EF7BB67EC6EA2--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?flr3iq$of7$1>