Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:      David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
To:        brett@lariat.org, schulte+freebsd@nospam.schulte.org, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip
Message-ID:  <200204181618.g3IGIwkd029030@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020418095356.024354c0@nospam.lariat.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:10:15 -0600
>From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>

>At 11:11 PM 4/17/2002, Christopher Schulte wrote:

>>You can synchronize your source tree and recompile.  See:

>>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/synching.html

>Alas, this is not an acceptable solution. 

>I realize that many people use FreeBSD on non-mission-critical systems, or
>to tinker with, and can afford downtime. But we need to create and maintain
>production machines.

>I hope that you can understand that doing a CVSup and then rebuilding the 
>world every night (slowing the system to a crawl in the process and
>creating a system which might or might not be 100% stable) is not an 
>acceptable solution. Nor is downloading a random snapshot. (Which one
>can't seem to do anyway these days; releng4.freebsd.org is refusing

That is irrelevant and specious.

If you have systems that are that important to you -- and I do, even
here at home -- then acquire a machine to do the builds, and then use
some method other than "build in place" to install the result.  In some
cases, that could be NFS (perhaps over a special network dedicated to
such tasks); in others, it could be using such capabilities as provided
by atacontrol to insert a drive with a system image while the target
system remains up and running.

In neither case is the target system required to do the builds (and
consume the time and other resources necessary).

>What is needed is a known good "p3" (or "p-whatever") build that can be 
>installed quickly with minimum downtime. Yet, despite the fact that 
>people routinely refer to (for example) "4.5-RELEASE-p3", no such build 
>seems to actually exist. For those of us who create and manage production 
>servers, there should be.

Patches?  Thanks....

Cheers,
david       (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david)
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david@catwhisker.org
Based on my experience as a computing professional, I consider the use of
Microsoft products as components of computing systems to be just as
advisable as using green wood to frame a house... and expect similar results.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204181618.g3IGIwkd029030>