Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 21:44:39 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Scott <freebsdq@sonservers.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improper shutdown of system / Fragmentation Problems / Boot Message-ID: <20040609194439.GD11712@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <200469142140.786530@IBM-R40> References: <200406091845.i59Ij8Y12090@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <200469142140.786530@IBM-R40>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--neYutvxvOLaeuPCA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 02:21:40PM -0500, Scott wrote: > As a newbie to FreeBSD, I may be way off base, but it seems=20 > very logical to me that the size of your drive or partition=20 > would make a difference on at what percentage full one would=20 > start to notice problems. >=20 > In terms of megs/gigs 80% of 120 gigs still has a lot of=20 > work space left. 80% of 4 gigs is not much. I would think=20 > with a larger drive/partition, one could run at a higher=20 > percentage before trouble started. >=20 > It makes sense to me anyway :) That's what one would like, but UFS doesn't work that way. It's allocation algorithm assumes 10% of the disk is free -- regardless of actual size. Or = so I've been told (multiple times). IMHO this is a bit ridiculous -- I mean, given 1 TB of space (nearly feasib= le for a home server right now), why would an FS allocator need 10% of that if the files on the volume are averaging 10 MB? But then again, and this is worth noting -- I'm certainly nowhere near as clueful as others on how to design a stable & fast file system. Seeing as UFS1 is still in use, and has been for the last 20 years (think about it!),= I think maybe the tradeoff might make sense to an expert... BTW, note that you really need to consider the perfomance drop for yourself -- like others said, if the files on the volume change infrequently, performance matters little, and space more so. --Stijn --=20 This sentence contradicts itself -- no actually it doesn't. -- Hofstadter --neYutvxvOLaeuPCA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAx2inY3r/tLQmfWcRAgG5AJ4/v0XKg/OFj+8VtWc1TEy1zKAtLgCgpa7n 24QCEWJQpf2pU7Gqlpzxum4= =+qsU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --neYutvxvOLaeuPCA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040609194439.GD11712>