Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 10:56:51 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: dbader@umiacs.umd.edu Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux ELF binaries under FreeBSD 2.2-stable Message-ID: <199707280126.KAA02571@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199707272153.RAA21969@eve.umiacs.umd.edu> from "David A. Bader" at "Jul 27, 97 05:53:45 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David A. Bader stands accused of saying: > > Does anyone know what the "correct" method for running the Linux > compatibility modules? Currently, I have the "COMPAT_LINUX" option > compiled into my kernel, which was adequate, but I noticed that the > rc.conf option for Linux (which I haven't enabled) loads the > linux_mod.o LKM. Which is the better method? The LKM is "better" in that you don't have to rebuild your kernel to make it work. > David A. Bader, Ph.D. Office: 301-405-6755 -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707280126.KAA02571>