Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 18:22:02 -0700 From: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> To: =?utf-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C8=99or?= <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [toolchain] lib/clan/llvm.build.mk: Shouldn't BUILD_TRIPLE definition rely host 'cc -dumpmachine'? Message-ID: <D5E3972C-092A-49A2-8649-71AD87BBA68B@dsl-only.net> In-Reply-To: <12E66105-6E1D-4941-B4C4-3BBAC0F3B330@dsl-only.net> References: <CAK0XTWczya8vg_sQZPqz-ZyYZRMq1v6p%2Bjs90S%2BjaDHxo2=1gA@mail.gmail.com> <CDAA0CB5-F1FC-40FE-AEC5-56FD64654671@FreeBSD.org> <7CAFD8CC-BDA1-4E89-BD7E-D0089E27036F@dsl-only.net> <CAK0XTWdRjek6StRktBfn0oGMo1ixTohs6NPoyDx__QMQ56ki_g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.21.1711042354060.4053@anthias.pfeifer.com> <CAK0XTWdUbwqfkXu%2B2bpmUGPLtPu_%2B3hEr1fdWeg4KosKW0QXQA@mail.gmail.com> <12E66105-6E1D-4941-B4C4-3BBAC0F3B330@dsl-only.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2017-Nov-4, at 6:02 PM, Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> wrote:
> On 2017-Nov-4, at 5:19 PM, Eddy Petri=C8=99or <eddy.petrisor at =
gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Pe 5 nov. 2017 12:57 AM, "Gerald Pfeifer" <gerald at pfeifer.com> a =
scris:
>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2017, Eddy Petri=C8=99or wrote:
>>> Yep --and it is even more complicated: gcc vs. clang are sometimes
>>> different for the target listed. . .
>>>=20
>>> For example -m32 for amd64 changes the clang result:
>>>=20
>>> # clang -dumpmachine
>>> x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.0
>>>=20
>>> ..
>>>=20
>>> # gcc7 -dumpmachine
>>> x86_64-portbld-freebsd12.0
>>=20
>> That's not actually related to GCC, but the lang/gcc* ports using
>> the FreeBSD Ports Collection's default that explicitly set
>>=20
>> Yes, I know. That's why I said the vendor part must be forced to =
"unknown".
>>=20
>>=20
>> CONFIGURE_TARGET?=3D ${ARCH}-portbld-${OPSYS:tl}${OSREL}
>>=20
>> By default GCC would use the same as clang.
>>=20
>> Sure, but that doesn't mean the vendor part of the triple in the =
default compiler is guaranteed to be 'unknown'.
>=20
> The "unknown" vs. "portbld" has a specific meaning
> for a FreeBSD context:
>=20
> unknown: it is a devel/* port
> portbld: it is a lang/* port
>=20
> This keeps the likes of devel/powerpc64-gcc
> and lang/gcc6 from having conflicting files
> on a powerpc64 FreeBSD machine, even when
> they are at the same (full) version.
>=20
> The variation that I intended to write about
> was the x86_64 vs. i386 variation when -m32
> is in use. That is a separate issue from
> unknown vs. portbld .
I forgot to mention that I also intended to
write about the -gnueabihf suffix vs. not
for armv7 between various normal FreeBSD
compilers (system and ports compilers).
=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
markmi at dsl-only.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D5E3972C-092A-49A2-8649-71AD87BBA68B>