Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:08:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Runt frames = broken VLAN ? Message-ID: <200108282008.f7SK88340636@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.10.10108281549570.19482-100000@spider.pilosoft.com> References: <200108281759.f7SHxh439282@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <Pine.BSO.4.10.10108281549570.19482-100000@spider.pilosoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:53:31 -0400 (EDT), Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com> said: > Disagree. Packet is either a runt or not a runt. It cannot be > inconsistently bridged it to one (trunk) interface but not to (access) > interface. Runt-ness is not a property of the contents of the frame, it's a property of the wire the frame is sent on. A frame bridged from another network with no minimum frame length must be properly padded upon output if it is to be sent on an Ethernet. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108282008.f7SK88340636>