Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:15:58 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Koichiro IWAO <meta@vmeta.jp> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: single PR vs multiple PR Message-ID: <5289BEAE.5030404@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <59985f9fec5e0c1741281f6a49342a38@vmeta.jp> References: <59985f9fec5e0c1741281f6a49342a38@vmeta.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/18/2013 06:46, Koichiro IWAO wrote: > When maintainer-updating ports, generally, I think one port per one PR > is a good manner. Do committers mind if I made a single PR such a case > applying quite similar changes to multiple port? Which do comitters prefer? > > For example: > https://redports.org/changeset?reponame=&new=19778%40meta%2Fnet&old=19668%40meta%2Fnet Hi Koichiro IWAO, I believe most people prefer one (1) PR when it's basically the same change across several related or similar ports. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5289BEAE.5030404>