Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:53:06 -0500
From:      "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com>
To:        "Pawel Jakub Dawidek" <pjd@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS patches.
Message-ID:  <11167f520807280853u135eb813r20eb6d78734344b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080728125711.GH2953@garage.freebsd.pl>
References:  <20080727125413.GG1345@garage.freebsd.pl> <200807272034.01290.max@love2party.net> <20080728083303.GD2953@garage.freebsd.pl> <200807281454.36892.max@love2party.net> <20080728125711.GH2953@garage.freebsd.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I was probably too optimistic. The default kmem_size is probably just
> too low. I'm quite sure it would be too low even for Solaris.

In your estimation what is a good setting for kmem_size ?


Sam Fourman Jr.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11167f520807280853u135eb813r20eb6d78734344b>