Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:33:23 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> To: Brian McGovern <bmcgover@cisco.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Req: Feedback on Building 2.2.6 on server that needs CAM.... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9811181232390.14521-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <199811181506.KAA02379@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Brian McGovern wrote: > I've been going back and forth between running a July Snapshot of 2.2.6-STABLE > with CAM support, and running 3.0. > > The issue at hand is that I need to be able to run an Adaptec 2940U2W, hence > the need for CAM support. However, one of my main objectives of this server > will be to build 2.2.6 [CAM not required at this point] images with some > local device drivers and enhancements. > > Therefore, I'm looking for some feedback as to what "makes the most sense". My > options are: > > 1.) Use 3.0 as a server, and build an ELF 2.2.6. What?!? That won't work. > 2.) Use 3.0 as a server, and build 2.2.6 with -aout specified. > 3.) Use 2.2.6-STABLE with CAM support to build 2.2.6. You have a recent snapshot? > 4.) Build a machine sans the 2940U2Ws, and use 2.2.X. Probably the best solution. Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.03.9811181232390.14521-100000>