Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 01:54:28 +0000 () From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: scott@statsci.com Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: how to "fix" more(1) vs termcap/terminfo? Message-ID: <199511280154.BAA06536@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199511280141.RAA12840@block.statsci.com> from "Scott Blachowicz" at Nov 27, 95 05:41:35 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Blachowicz stands accused of saying: > Aha! Let's compare that termcap entry to the FreeBSD standard > one...FreeBSD sez: Ah. I knew it was a site problem 8) > > More, under 2.0.5-RELEASE, 2.1-STABLE or 2.2-CURRENT does not appear > > to use the ti/te capability in an xterm. > > Do you say that because you've looked at the source code (I don't have > mine handy right now)? Or just that you haven't observed the effects? In > other words, could the lack of ti/te caps in the distributed /etc/termcap > explain everything? No, I made the (incredibly bogus) assumption that the standard xterm termcap had ti/te in it, and couldn't reproduce your problem. Sorry. > Which brings me back to my original observation that there ought to be an > option to do one of the following: > > 1) Completely disable ti/te cap usage from more. > 2) Unconditionally force a prompt at EOF. > > I suppose I should just do a 'send-pr', huh? Or you could add the option to more, and submit the changes 8) > Scott Blachowicz Ph: 206/283-8802x240 StatSci, a div of MathSoft, Inc. -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 041-122-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] "Who does BSD?" "We do Chucky, we do." [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511280154.BAA06536>