Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:19:04 +0930 From: Brian Astill <bastill@sa.apana.org.au> To: John Bleichert <syborg@stny.rr.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Is simplicity despised? WAS: What do we need in a FreeBSD desktop? Message-ID: <200208070150.g771nwL39231@tierzero.apana.org.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208060814060.6505-100000@janeway.vonbek.dhs.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208060814060.6505-100000@janeway.vonbek.dhs.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 21:47, John Bleichert wrote: > Nobody will ever convince me there's a better wm-agnostic editor than > nedit for a new user. I have heard good reports about nedit from people using many platforms. (memo to self: MUST try nedit) > Also, does anybody really want the FreeBSD installer changed? Maybe the > addition of an 'instant-workstation' install would be ok, but in my IMHO > /stand/sysinstall is the best installer out there. No. you miss the point here. Instant Workstation is an option in /stand/sysinstall. What we are arguing about is the default editor in that install. At the moment it is EDITOR=vi. I think something simpler is called for. -- Regards, Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208070150.g771nwL39231>