Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:20:05 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Subject: Re: NFS (& amd?) dysfunction descending a hierarchy Message-ID: <493EEF15.4050600@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20081209200431.GL2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20081203001538.GC96383@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20081209190110.GW60731@albert.catwhisker.org> <20081209200431.GL2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 11:01:10AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:15:38PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: >>> I seem to have a fairly- (though not deterministly so) reproducible >>> mode of failure with an NFS-mounted directory hierarchy: An attempt to >>> traverse a "sufficiently large" hierarchy (e.g., via "tar zcpf" or "rm >>> -fr") will fail to "visit" some subdirectories, typically apparently >>> acting as if the subdirectories in question do not actually exist >>> (despite the names having been returned in the output of a previous >>> readdir()). >>> ... > > Did you saw me previous answer ? Supposed patch for your problem was > committed to head as r185557, and MFCed to 7 in r185796, and to > 7.1 in r185801. > > Please test with latest sources. did you notice that he tested with latest -current and releng 7?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?493EEF15.4050600>