Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 May 2005 12:31:37 -0400
From:      "Michael W. Lucas" <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
To:        doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml
Message-ID:  <20050512163137.GA74349@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050512162100.GA50447@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
References:  <200505121505.j4CF5c7i076426@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050512152855.GD92175@eddie.nitro.dk> <20050512154337.GA73901@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20050512162100.GA50447@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:21:00PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:43:37AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:28:55PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > > On 2005.05.12 15:05:38 +0000, Michael Lucas wrote:
> > > > mwlucas     2005-05-12 15:05:38 UTC
> > > > 
> > > >   FreeBSD doc repository
> > > > 
> > > >   Modified files:
> > > >     en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml 
> > > >   Log:
> > > >   Rewrite "math co-processor" answer to make it more clear and readable.
> > > >   
> > > >   Do we even run out-of-the-box on hardware without a math co-processor
> > > >   these days?
> > > 
> > > I don't think FreeBSD 5 runes without math co-processor at all, but
> > > I'm not sure.
> > 
> > I agree: I'm not sure.
> > 
> > If someone is sure, I would be more than happy to axe the whole
> > question (along with the other math co-processor FAQs).
> 
> /usr/src/UPDATING says:
> 
> 20030722:
>     FPU-less support has been removed from FreeBSD.  Chances are you won't
>     notice.  386+387 support should still work after this change, but
>     it is now a minimum requirement for the i386 port that you have real
>     FPU hardware.
> 
> 
> This was between 5.1 and 5.2 so all releases from the 5-STABLE branch
> need a real FPU.  Note that 4.11 still works with an emulated FPU (and
> is still officially supported) so it might not be wise to remove the
> section entirely.

Checking the docs.  What a thought.  Axed, thanks!

> (While talking about supported hardware it might also be noted that to
> run 5.x on a real 80386 (+80387 FPU) you need to recompile word+kernel
> with 386 support (see the 2005027 and 20010116 entries in UPDATING),
> and for 6-CURRENT all support for a real 80386 (with or without FPU)
> has been axed completely (20041116 entry in UPDATING))

I'll see if I can put that in.

On the other hand: is that a FAQ?  Isn't that in the hardware notes?

==ml

-- 
Michael W. Lucas	mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org
		http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/

"The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequiter



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050512163137.GA74349>