Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:21:00 +0000
From:      RW <>
Subject:   Re: Gutmann Method on Empty Space
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:38:27 -0800
"Jason C. Wells" <> wrote:

> It's interesting to note that Gutmann's earlier work said, loosely
> "If you do this, you should be fairly certain you data is
> unrecoverable." He now says, "A few passes of random data is as good
> as can be expected."  Those two standards of performance are very
> different.  

But he goes on to say:

"Looking at this from the other point of view, with the ever-increasing
data density on disk platters and a corresponding reduction in feature
size and use of exotic techniques to record data on the medium, it's
unlikely that anything can be recovered from any recent drive except
perhaps a single level via basic error-cancelling techniques." 

So even those few passes of random data are overkill.

>          I just want to make sure that any given day that the police
> come take my functioning computers way that nothing can be recovered
> that I explicitly deleted.  

The police just take disk images.

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>