Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:14:57 -0700 From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> To: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind in FreeBSD, security advisories Message-ID: <CAOjFWZ4Ak=rx3b0mTvM3d9DiJMeq1oXGk-J1B%2Bb==ompYaDuxQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAO%2BPfDctepQY0mGH7H%2BgOSm4HJwhe-RCND%2BmxAArnRxpWiCsjg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAO%2BPfDctepQY0mGH7H%2BgOSm4HJwhe-RCND%2BmxAArnRxpWiCsjg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-07-30 12:55 AM, "David Demelier" <demelier.david@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > For years, a lot of security advisories have been present for bind. > I'm just guessing if it's not a good idea to remove bind from base? > > This will probably free by half the number of FreeBSD SA's in the future. Hasn't this discussion occurred several times already on the -current mailing list over the past year? And hadn't unbound and/or ldns been imported into - current already? This just seems very familiar somehow...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOjFWZ4Ak=rx3b0mTvM3d9DiJMeq1oXGk-J1B%2Bb==ompYaDuxQ>