Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:11:11 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov <bland@bbnest.net> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org>, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.26 available for FreeBSD Message-ID: <cfa6c4998cd95bc86ea8739e525ba764@mail> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904211617470.2672@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <1239343955.4933.113.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904140427160.2317@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239669463.1304.67.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904140439310.2317@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239670126.1304.75.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904140451240.2317@woozle.rinet.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904140504380.2317@woozle.rinet.ru> <3f1fd1ea0904131951u5e6b211dlbb55af484d91e63b@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904141419060.62790@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239717249.1407.9.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904142104300.11410@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239730007.1304.237.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904142219331.11410@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239736472.1304.251.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904142322000.21559@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239737820.1304.265.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904181327040.56580@woozle.rinet.ru> <1240188770.1356.26.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904211617470.2672@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:19:30 +0400 (MSD), Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> wrote: > JMC> Actually, I have always shied away from such things. We regularly get > JMC> requests to change the meta-port, but we long ago took the philosophy to > JMC> keep the Desktop meta-port as close to the official set of GNOME Desktop > JMC> components as possible. If we add an option for this, then we slide > JMC> down the slope of making everything optional. > JMC> > JMC> In the past I've simply prompted people to create their own local > JMC> meta-ports, or install x11/gnome2-lite (no user-share there), then build > JMC> on that for what they need. > > Well, then I suppose we should at least say something about this in release > notes, because in 7.2 one of *major* desktop application sets conflicts with > one of the *widest* server component. What do you propose to write in the release notes which could help Apache 1.3+ lovers? And may I in turn quote a bit of another release notes: http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement1.3.html "We strongly recommend that users of all earlier versions, including 1.3 family release, upgrade to to the current 2.2 version as soon as possible." :-^)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cfa6c4998cd95bc86ea8739e525ba764>