Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 23:11:07 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Jonathan Weiss <jw@innerewut.de> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Using Subversion for binary distribution? Message-ID: <20070525201106.GE1824@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <4656D01F.4070701@innerewut.de> References: <20070525074925.GA19294@uk.tiscali.com> <20070525104342.GA2761@kobe.laptop> <4656D01F.4070701@innerewut.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-05-25 14:01, Jonathan Weiss <jw@innerewut.de> wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> The checked out tree would be "polluted" with .svn/ >> subdirectories with all the metadata of the Subversion >> workspace too (that's where permissions will be tricky to get >> right). > > The is always SVK with does not pollute the working dir. Yay! I'm not mad for suggesting a distributed SCM in another post elsethread. You're right of course. Now, I'm not 100% sure I like the idea of using an SCM tool for managing binary files like the FreeBSD base system, but it's kind of nice that other people like the idea of using a distributed SCM for this :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070525201106.GE1824>