Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:06:40 +0930 From: "O'Connor, Daniel" <darius@dons.net.au> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: fsck vs zvol Message-ID: <5A6525DB-38C3-46F3-8E75-DB60B41BCFA9@dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: <2f05a0bc-ab3b-c0fc-8db1-691cd413ada7@grosbein.net> References: <06546140-1B02-432D-8B7C-525AA1EA4FBA@dons.net.au> <ad9fc776-c567-fe34-44bd-0c6ab4e09d76@grosbein.net> <12AF5B03-1CD2-4D40-B6B7-0E4A65BCBACD@dons.net.au> <2f05a0bc-ab3b-c0fc-8db1-691cd413ada7@grosbein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 22:21, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> wrote: >=20 > 12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >=20 >>>> The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I = wrote..) >=20 > You should correct this page and change the line for /etc/fstab > and use non-zero value for fsck pass number. Good idea, done. -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A6525DB-38C3-46F3-8E75-DB60B41BCFA9>