Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:36:54 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.database.mk Message-ID: <20051111133654.53679f43@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <200511111029.jABATMW9087903@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200511111029.jABATMW9087903@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > vsevolod 2005-11-11 10:29:21 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > Mk bsd.database.mk > Log: > - Use lower in USE_BDB and USE_SQLITE to make tests > - Fix comment about BROKEN > - Fix wrong dependency on sqlite Can we be _consistent_ in respect of the *_DATABASE* variables ? E.g. either WITH_DATABASE_VER= nn or USE_DATABASE= nn as user settable option; BROKEN_WITH_DATABASE (it should be a enumeration and work for all databases); WANT_DATABASE_VERSION= nn; DEFAULT_DATABASE_VER= nn. Why is the default BDB version 4.1 (and not 4.3) ? Can we export for *all* databases DATABASE_VER ? At least of BDB this is necessary since the include path differs depending of the version; having this also simplifies handling what to install and what not, ./configure option, etc. in ports. I'm not criticizing your work and I'll do the patch if you want once how it should be. Thanks, -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" War isn't a good life, but it's life. -- Kirk, "A Private Little War", stardate 4211.8
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051111133654.53679f43>