Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Feb 1999 00:09:23 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra)
Cc:        tlambert@primenet.com, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, mjacob@feral.com
Subject:   Re: Could somebody please test this patch?
Message-ID:  <199902060009.RAA18825@usr02.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990205131940.jdp@polstra.com> from "John Polstra" at Feb 5, 99 01:19:40 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > The assumption in the EABI that specifies ELF and specifies the
> > offset at which the binary is linked is pretty ingrained in the
> > binaries.
> 
> But this is for the dynamic linker, not for executables.

Never mind.  When you said "dynamic linker" I thought "ld.so",
which gets mapped to a specific address for Alpha binaries by the
image activator, not the crt0.o (that's why you can dlopen from
static executable on an Alpha; same for SVR4 and Solaris, for
that matter).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902060009.RAA18825>