Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:06:47 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gy=F6rgy_Vilmos?= <vilmos.gyorgy@gmail.com> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases Message-ID: <dac6660e0909301106t2591be23t675eb5a2aa0b6bd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10909290811p6ac49f7fxaf7e7d4bf631da4c@mail.gmail.com> References: <dac6660e0909290040k5e0ac9a0mafe4e484802f8429@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe10909290811p6ac49f7fxaf7e7d4bf631da4c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, 2009/9/29 Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> > 2009/9/29 Gy=F6rgy Vilmos <vilmos.gyorgy@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > > > I've done a benchmark of recent versions of PostgreSQL's last five majo= r > > releases to see how performance has changed during the past years from > > version to version. > > You can find the article here: > > http://suckit.blog.hu/2009/09/26/postgresql_history > > > > The tests were conducted on FreeBSD 8/amd64 on a midrange x86 server (4 > > CPUs, 24 cores, 128GiB RAM). > > Do you have informations about the systime when doing such tests? > I haven't got enough time to do the measurement right, so I could not log that. But according to top there were idle times. BTW, even on one thread, Linux (2.6.31) performs much better, better means here 790 TPS vs. 580... --=20 http://suckit.blog.hu/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dac6660e0909301106t2591be23t675eb5a2aa0b6bd>