Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 01:55:02 +0900 (JST) From: Yoshiaki Kasahara <kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1000baseTX? Message-ID: <20050306.015502.73731903.kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <22209.1110018710@bizet.nethelp.no> References: <20050305095601.GA4821@freebie.xs4all.nl> <22209.1110018710@bizet.nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 11:31:50 +0100, sthaug@nethelp.no said: > So I stand by my claim that 1000base-T is clearly more correct than > 1000baseTX. It would be nice to get this fixed - however, it is a > minor point and I certainly believe that there are other tasks that > are more important. Thank you for your additional information about documentation. And I agree with your comment that it is a minor problem. I see frequent (sometimes very minor) rewrites/fixing typos of comments and documents in FreeBSD source tree, so I thought it was worth mentioning... Regards, -- Yoshiaki Kasahara Computing and Communications Center, Kyushu University kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050306.015502.73731903.kasahara>